Me: perhaps you should examine why ur so repulsed by trans bodies instead of pretending like there’s no way it’s a symptom of u being raised in a transphobic society
A Cis™ *already in tears*: i can;;;t believe u want to force mea to have sex with all tthe transes 😦 thinkin u are gross is just who i am 😦 😦 why cannn;t u JUST accept that i seeu u as less desirable based solely on my invasssive assumptions aboout ur geniatals :- ( 😦
You could also stop trying to use other people’s bodies to validate your gender and accept that the physical body is real important to people and stop acting like incels but you do you boo
Time for a game I call “Transmed or TERF”.
Oh oh I love this game! Calling trans people terfs is so much fun! Hmmm…. I’m going to go with bloke with common sense here
Ah, sadly, your argument was the subject of the game, since it’s identical to that of TERFs.
I’ll give terf’s one thing, there are a lot of real fucking awful trans people out there trying to trick or guilt gay people into fucking them because woke points (aka validate my gender with your body even though you specifically don’t want to)
I’d offer a retort about how TERFs certainly claim that but really you’d be better off re-reading the OP.
I just read the tags:
Sexist? TERFs use women as a scapegoat/shield from criticism often enough without other people helping them.
Mad cuz you’re an incel, aren’t ya, babe? Anyway no one has any right to people’s bodies or their beds. If “don’t guilt people into fucking you” and “no means no” sounds like terf speak to you then you belong on the registry 👍
Nobody has any right to people’s bodies.
Don’t guilt people into fucking you.
No means no.
These aren’t “TERF speak”. They were never in doubt or question. They are not something being argued against. “TERF speak” is pretending that they were, ignoring actual arguments and actual problems in favour of straw arguments and ad hominem (though in this case those are euphemisms).
It’s a malicious, cowardly lie that exploits a serious problem (rape culture) to derail discussion and distract from what’s actually being criticised.
The idea that “no means no” is “TERFy” only benefits TERFs and their masquerade as mere protectors of common virtue.
Your joke “mad cuz you’re an incel, aren’t ya, babe?” in stark contrast to slander of being a sex offender (not something to joke about). And, while I know incels are an easy target for criticism (and they do deserve it), do I have to point out how it echoes the proud misogynist tradition of telling feminists “you’re just mad because you can’t get sex”?
Thank you for standing up for us, and exposing cis women’s accusations for the lies they are! Oh, they certainly claim that sometimes identityfluid AMABs such as myself commit violent crimes, and resort to malicious, cowardly tactics like citing “evidence” or directly quoting us, and that’s just not cricket, but you know what those cis women are like, getting all hysterical and making things up.
They don’t even stop to think about whether it makes us look bad when one (or several) of us is caught being “violent” or “coercive”. If they were real allies, they’d pipe down and stop making such a fuss. Otherwise folx might think there was something to this “male violence” thing, and that’s the real sexism.
Stranglewank Hitman 