RIP Hugh Hefner, you were inspirational

Rest in peace, Hugh Hefner. TT_TT I was devastated to hear of his death. Right now I’m wearing my dark grey suit (all my black ones are at the dry cleaners, it’s been a busy and unusually messy week) and practising some much-needed self-care for the grieving process with a few lines and a large Watenshi. I shall pour some out for you, Hugh.

You were a huge inspiration to me. With Playboy, you helped bring sexual violence to the mainstream. When I first started out as an extreme BDSM breath play specialist sex worker, it was hard: the families of my targets would find their loved ones dead from an apparent sadomasochistic auto-erotic asphyxiation and they’d say, “no, I won’t believe he was a pervert, he must have been murdered” and call the police. We were under constant threat of arrest and imprisonment. But now, thanks in part to your tireless work, violence is considered an intrinsic part of sex, and even quite feminist and liberating and empowering: these days, my targets’ relatives tend to say “well, he was an open-minded sort of guy, so he probably was into choke porn”.

When I was a young man, you inspired me to embrace my urges and see my targets as objects, as not fully human, and turn my craft into a legitimate business. And not just me; the best serial killers loved your work. Ted Bundy said “pornography fuels this kind of thought process. Then it is instrumental in crystallizing it.” You meant so much to our community.

Though, blimey charlie, the whole “pimping, watching women forced to have sex with dogs, pushing Quaaludes on underage girls and calling them ‘thigh-openers’ and never using condoms or getting STD checks” thing, that was taking it a bit far! I’m just an assassin, that’s a bit much!

Novara Media are our #allies! <3

I was very surprised and really quite overwhelmed to see an article from Novara Media promoting decriminalisation of the sex industry. I thought with all their previous talk of “exploitation” and “violence” under capitalism, they were against industrious young entrepreneurs like me, but when I saw the headline “5 Reasons We Must Decriminalise the Sex Industry – And Fast”, I realised they must have had a change of heart.
(◠‿◠

)

I am not a pimp or a trafficker. I am neither a rape apologist nor
someone who excuses violence against women. I do not believe men have a
right to buy sex, or that anyone, of any gender, should be forced to
sell sex. One might have thought these things go without saying, and yet
they are examples of some of the vitriol levied at us – those that
advocate for the decriminalisation of the sex industry.

Your struggle is mine, dear author. I also get very upset when people assume that by saying my clients should be decriminalised, I’m therefore saying that my clients have a right to buy my services. I’m not saying that at all, I’m just saying that if they choose to hire me or any other sex worker, they shouldn’t face any negative consequences for that choice. It’s a clear distinction.

In recent weeks, the establishment media has provided a platform – an
‘everywhere-you-turn’ kind of platform – to anti-prostitution feminists.
Julie Bindel does, after all, have a new book to publicise.

Well, that explains why she magically cares about the sex industry all of a sudden. My old agency said she was a really mean SKERF and banned her work from our premises and I’ve continued that ban as a sole trader so I admit I’m not too familiar with her output. But come on, I’m nearly 35 and in my lifetime, when has she ever cared about sexual violence?

Underpinning the arguments of many anti-prostitution feminists is the
idea that the purchase of sex ought to be criminalised and sex workers
understood as victims of male violence. They argue we should be doing
more to eradicate the sex industry and rescue the sex workers within it.

The author doesn’t dignify these SKERFy prejudices with a response, so neither shall I.

These anti-prostitution advocates are right about one thing: our sex
work laws require reform. Yet as the English Collective of Prostitutes,
SWARM, and other sex worker-led organisations have said time and again,
it’s only through the decriminalisation of all consensual aspects of the
sex industry that sex workers can be adequately protected. Here are some of the reasons why.

Absolutely. I mean, these sex worker-led organisations are largely run by managers and agencies, but the managers represent the workers after all, so they do indirectly represent us. I’ve been saying for a long time that our managers and clients need to be decriminalised, and Novara Media gives some great additional insights to it.

1. Migrant sex workers are being targeted by the police.
…Decriminalisation would allow (migrant) sex workers to work in
collectives, to look out for one another in an indoor market that is far
safer than its street counterpart. It would mean less fear of the
police and of other agencies.

I don’t know much about this because I’m British, but my foreign colleagues say this is true. They keep getting hassled by the police – though they say it was even worse when they were trying to make a living in legal industries where the employers wanted “paperwork” and “documentation” and “proof of residence” and all that stuff, in fact that’s part of the reason they were contacted by managers and made the free and entirely rational choice to enter the industry.

2. The Modern Slavery agenda is causing more harm than good.
There are, of course, people who are trafficked into and exploited within the sex industry… [But] under this agenda,
voluntary migrant sex workers are being mislabelled as victims of
trafficking and deported under the ‘noble’ guise of rescue.

This is what I’m always saying! I’m a voluntary sex worker and I love my job, and I’m getting really tired of all these thousands of trafficking victims erasing my lived experience with their lived experience.

3. Violent clients are being allowed to act with impunity.
If all laws criminalising consensual sex work are removed… the minority of violent clients would
not then be able to attack sex workers with impunity.

I’m very glad to see journalists acknowledging that only a minority of our clients are violent. Extremist radical SKERFs say that the sexualised murder industry is inherently violent and non-consensual, which isn’t true at all. I mean, we get paid, so that’s consent right there. Only a minority of our clients threaten to break our legs or “silence” us after the job is complete. And I think that in itself is a product of criminalisation: if you criminalise hiring assassins, only criminals will hire us. If it were decriminalised, nice people would want to pay for kinky murders.
In fact, I recall a case where one of my former colleagues eliminated a target who was severely clinically depressed and suicidal and put a hit out on himself! If that’s not consensual, I don’t know what is.

4. Sex workers’ rights are not being recognised.
At TUC conference two weeks ago, delegates voted to reject Motion 39
on the decriminalisation of sex work put forward by ASLEF and supported
by GMB. Harriet Harman spoke at the conference, claiming the sex
industry is exploitative. It seems counter-intuitive that unions would
refuse to offer protection to exploited workers precisely because the industry in which they work can be exploitative.

I posted about this at the time, I was very upset! Harriet Harman sounds like she wants to destroy the whole industry and get all of us out of it rather than support the workers in it. We should have the right to join one of the sex workers unions instead of only our managers and agencies joining them. (I didn’t know the unions offered protection, though – how does it compare, price-wise, to Big Dave and his security services?)

It seems some people remain unwilling to accept that the vast majority
of sex workers have made a rational choice to sell sex. After all, 70%
of female sex workers are thought to be mothers and, like all mothers,
they want to provide for their children.

That’s certainly a rational choice. Some might say “but if it’s a choice between sex work and not providing for your children, surely that’s no choice at all?”. Well, perhaps they’d make that choice too, and that’s perfectly rational. All choices are valid! Not everyone would choose the same way, though, and you have to respect that choice. For example, back in his days in the KGB, Dmitry assumed a fake identity, married a local woman and had kids with her as part of his cover, and after he’d gathered the information he needed, he had no qualms whatsoever about walking out on his wife and children and never contacting them again! The Child Support Agency chases him every few months, he told them he was dead years ago but they lost the paperwork.

5. Anti-prostitution advocates are wilfully misrepresenting the sex workers’ rights perspective…
But the majority of sex workers today tell us that criminalising the purchase of sex will not make sex workers safer.

This is also true. These anti-sex work bigots keep saying prejudiced things like “but Gaspar, you’re privileged compared to other sex workers” and “what about all the thousands of survivors who exited the industry and advocate the Nordic model of criminalising the clients and managers”. That’s why it’s nice to see this article cite a study based exclusively on empowered, independent sex workers like myself and not on anyone employed by a manager or who has since left the industry (although only 52% said they did “feel able to stop sex working if they so wished”, so perhaps they could’ve chosen the sample a bit better). And it focuses on the workers’ beliefs instead of empirical data or crime statistics! Finally, my thoughts and feelings are being treated with the respect they deserve, bwim they are considered empirical facts!

The article finishes with an inspiring message:

What has to happen before the government listens?

Well, I have some hope for the future. It has been suggested that lots of MPs are former clients – none of them has hired me, but I can tell it’s not their first rodeo! ^_< (incidentally, I had nothing to do with the former member for Eastleigh, that was wayyyyy before my time, I was just a schoolboy, I was far too busy committing minor acts of arson and animal cruelty, so stop asking me) Either way, a lot of them are rich assigned-male-at-births, which tends to be the demographic of my client base, and they do vote in their own self-interest. Fingers crossed!

So in summary, a big thank-you and hugs to Novara Media, from your favourite extreme BDSM specialist sex worker
ヘ(^_^ヘ)

Why are so many of your victims men?

(Please self-crit for saying “victims”, we prefer “targets”. Saying “victim” implies that there was some kind of violence, and there wasn’t; I got paid, so it’s all fine.)

To answer your question, I’ve no idea! I didn’t know they were men. I always ask my clients for the target’s pronouns, so I can treat them with some dignity before I murder them and pose their throttled corpse to look like an auto-erotic asphyxiation accident, but they usually just say “fuck, man, I don’t know, are you going to do the job or not?” and give me a photo and a name and sometimes an address. So I simply don’t know the gender of most of my targets.

For some reason, most of them seem to be AMAB (assigned male at birth). It’s strange, because I try to stay abreast of crime statistics and police investigations for obvious reasons, and I’ve heard that murders of AFAB (assigned female at birth) people is extremely common – here in the UK, two AFABs are murdered every week by their AMAB intimate partner, and more are killed by AMAB relatives. It is usually AMABs who hire me to murder other AMABs, but I suppose they don’t tend to involve outside contractors in murders of AFABs, they seem to want to do that by themselves.

Why is that? I don’t know. The gender my clients and targets were assigned at birth doesn’t have any effect on them, or indeed on anything, so we just don’t know.
¯_(ツ)_/¯

More sexy pictures of me doing my empowering BDSM sex work! ^_-

So since I posted the last video stills, I’ve found that there seems to be a big demand for pictures of men committing strangulations. Lots of other assigned-male-at-birth people seem to think they’re sexy, for some reason. Well, I’m really flattered! I hope it’s okay that my victims are almost always men, I think they like watching women being choked, but I hope this will do (and tbqh if it doesn’t, then you’re a queerphobe for not getting off on same-sex lethal violence)!! Enjoy… ^_-

The oldest profession

I’ve mentioned before that contract killing is the oldest profession, and murdering people for money is not a new thing – we’ve been around forever, but sadly erased from history. So I just thought I’d share some facts with you lovely folx:

Contract killing occurs in nature

I’m sure you all know that lots of animals prey on other species, but chimpanzees – perhaps our closest living relatives – also kill other chimpanzees for other resources.

“Murder ‘comes naturally’ to chimpanzees”: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-29237276

“Killing competitors improves a male chimp’s access to resources like food and territory”.

I assume they mean male-identifying chimp here. Anyway, the point is, It’s entirely natural and healthy to kill members of your own species for money.

Assassins have operated all throughout history

Li Fuguo, a powerful official in Tang era China, was killed in 762CE by assassins hired by Emperor Daizong. Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44BCE, and Shakespeare even wrote the play Julius Caesar about it. And these are just the most famous cases – imagine how many other assassins must have operated over the years and had their stories erased from the narrative.
Part of the problem is the stigma against murder work, we have to conceal our identities, which is clearly problematic for all sorts of reasons, and it means our voices are never heard.

It’s in the Bible

Yup, for all the SKERFs side with religious groups in saying our profession is wrong, it’s even in the Bible. Sure, some of the Old Testament says it’s bad:

Deuteronomy 27:25:
‘Cursed be anyone who takes a bribe to shed innocent blood.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’

But the New Testament has a much nicer take on it. Acts 21:38 mentions “four thousand men of the Assassins”, and Matthew 26:14-16 tells the story of Judas Iscariot, who earned thirty pieces of silver for targeting Jesus (without which the resurrection couldn’t have happened, he had to die first, obvs).

And before y’all say “but Gaspar, those are just paid killings, they lack the sexual element of your trademark stranglewank”, that’s true, but check Mark 6:22-29 – Salome does a sexy dance for King Herod and puts a hit on John the Baptist.

So if you still think sexualised murder work is wrong or immoral, that means you think that all of these murders were wrong too, and you need to self-crit and apologise to our community!

The money shot (bwim this is the point where I murdered Mr. Secombe and I collected the money for it later). Sexy stuff!

This is after I posed the body post mortem to look like a choke ‘n’ stroke gone wrong. hawt isn’t it O_O;

When life gives you lemons
🍋

🍋

🍋 make lemonade! 🥂 Sure, the video of me murdering Mr. Secombe (the commodities magnate from my post a few days ago) was leaked, but if other people are going to exploit my work, why shouldn’t I exploit it myself? I can hardly call myself a murder-positive, pro-sex work activist if I don’t actually celebrate a job well done.

Besides, I think it’s a good thing that there’s a demand out there for pictures of brutal sexualised violence. I’m not sure why so many people on the Internet really like photos of people getting choked and find them sexy, but I feel very thankful and blessed that they do! I hope it will help to end the stigma against the sexual violence industry, and one day I can murder rich old men with cheerful abandon. Enjoy my work, as you can see I’ve been a very naughty boy ^_-

Do you have a significant other?

To be honest, I don’t get the chance to meet women much in this job. In my experience, most women have some SKERFy prejudices and have bought into the stigma against us, and they don’t want to date sex workers like me. Sure, they like the idea of it – they’re all like “oooh, James Bond is so handsome and dashing”, but then when you tell them you’re an assassin for real, they start screaming, like “get away from me, you psycho” (which is an ableist slur) and then I never see them again. Q_Q </3

I do have a sort of thing going with a girl from GCHQ who’s been tracking me. I sometimes work for foreign powers, so I think that’s why she started watching me, but now we just message each other from time to time. Well, I say we message each other, I just type something on my laptop, and then she hides these cute little notes for me in comment lines in the configuration files. ^_^ (Hi Ruth, I know you’re reading this, that’s what the government pays you for after all U3U)