21goblins-in-a-trenchcoat:
pigletkin:
21goblins-in-a-trenchcoat:
pigletkin:
21goblins-in-a-trenchcoat:
New rule: donât reblog something vague unless you know what itâs about. Stop falling for dogwhistles. The amount of people who blindly reblog a post like âthe lgbt community isnt just for anyoneâ or âif you care more about male feelings than female safetyâŠâ, not realising that the words written down donât reflect what the op meant. Who isnât the lgbt community for? If they meant pedophiles they wouldnât have had to avoid saying it. Who, exactly, is prioritising male feelings anyway? Turns out âmale feelingsâ often means trans peopleâs safety, and âfemale safetyâ means terfsâ comfort.
If you canât tell EXACTLY what a post is about, please donât reblog it until you know. It takes 5 seconds to search an opâs blog. Stop falling for dogwhistles.
youâre really out here comparing people who disagree with you on discourse to terfs huh
i. Youâve reached so far I canât even tell where youâve reached from. Is it because I acknowledged that both terfs and aphobes use dogwhistles? Is that what it was? I guess because I can acknowledge that cats sit in chairs and so do nazis that im basically saying cats are fucking nazis then i guess lol
fucking calm down oh my god i said stop falling for dogwhistles if you dont want this to apply to you dont use dogwhistles
oh come on, your post was clearly implying a similarity between the two. why would you be using both these things as examples of nasty dogwhistles on tumblr dot com if you didnât think they were similar? by saying that aphobe dogwhistles or whatever are just like terf dogwhistles you are implicitly comparing the other side of the ace discourse to terfs. this is a logical conclusion to come to from what you wrote. i am not reaching, you are backpedalling.
things are the same because theyâre both bad? Terfs = nazis = annoying advertisements = anti vaccers = donald trump? I think those are all things that tell lies you shouldnât fall for but i guess because of that theyâre all the same lol
I think youâre desperate to find some proof of Big Bad Inclusionists actually doing anything harmful ever and this is your latest pitiful attempt. Give up. Itâs not a good look.
Thank you for prioritising my feelings as a genderfluid male over other folx’ safety!
In my line of work, I need people to listen to my self-declared identity, and believe it, to let me into my targets’ spaces. When gatekeepers say mean things to me like “hey, you’re not my usual driver” or “this is a restricted area sir” I get very annoyed. Just because I’m there to commit so-called “physical violence” (which is nowhere near as bad as the very literal violence these people conduct against me by asking to check my ID), it’s no reason to exclude me.
If we dealt with every violent male by ostracising them and excluding them from safe spaces, what sort of world would we live in, I ask you?