rileyjaydennis:

What is a SWERF?

Thank-you so much for your support!
😍

Speaking as someone who works in an underground industry that some mean
old fake feminists call “violent” or “exploitative”, I really appreciate it. They don’t like hitmen either, they’re too busy wittering on about the “survivors” who aren’t in the industry any more (so they can hardly judge, can they?) and the ~90% of the industry who want to “escape the gangs as their first priority” and they completely exclude us consenting, high class workers. Yes, we might be the wealthiest 1% of the industry, but that makes us an excluded minority!

These
SWERFs claim that most of the violence we face comes from our clients
and managers, but what they don’t realise is that, if they didn’t listen to feminists, these gangsters,
crime lords and traffickers wouldn’t be so mean to us. I think the fact
that these nice, misunderstood men want to pay for violence rather than just do it for free actually says a lot about
their humanity.

Far too many of my former customers and managers are in prison for “violence against the person”, and it’s those feminists’ fault for criminalising GBH and murder.
If our work and our clients were decriminalised, we could do nice, clean kills, without having to worry about hiding the body. Wealthy men could relieve their violent urges in a healthy way by paying one of us wet workers for the violence they crave, instead of assaulting people indiscriminately, or, say, not assaulting anybody.

Personally, I love what I do, and I think I’m quite representative of the whole industry. If most of the industry really is all these so-called “trafficked children” and “survival prostitution victims”, how come we never see them doing a vlog series?
🤔

Do you mind if I share this with some of my customers, bt-dubs? They sometimes post on Punternet, and, I don’t mind telling you, they say some rather unfeminist things about AFAB workers! “She just was like a piece of meat”, “Kept saying and moaning I was hurting her“, “blood on condom”, “My guess is she’s been forced into this and doubt her age… Not impressed”

They could really do with being pulled up on their language! I don’t want to police their behaviour, and of course, the customer is always right, but the words are just a little problematic!

(Source: https://www.youtube.com/)

Expecting a knighthood any day now

Last week, I was delighted to see the Queen bestow an honour on another violence industry advocate!
🤩

Dame Catherine Healy, founder of the New Zealand Prostitutes Collective, is a brave soul who
“swapped her job as a primary school teacher to become a sex worker in the 1980s”,

and ever since, she’s been fighting for the rights of the well-educated folx who chose their jobs in the industry.

What’s more, the NZPC is super intersectional! Anna Reed of the NZPC said, “If I was young and beautiful, I would love to go on a ‘working holiday” somewhere where the laws protected me. That would be a great holiday… People come here knowing what they’re doing.“
This is just the sort of support and inclusivity we need for migrant folx who’ve been trafficked onto a working holiday.

They even write letters of support to folx like the Chow brothers , who are assigned-male-at-births who have a great interest in violence and exploitation.

Well, so the witnesses and so-called “victims” say, but, as the brothers’ defence lawyer said,
“If the situation was as bad as they portray, why would the NZ Prostitutes Collective support

[them]?”
🤔

Why indeed? Those silly girls are probably just mistaken or lying.

Anyway, Her Dameship says,
"It’s extraordinary to see how far we have come. This shows the
acceptance of this industry. We are a part of society, not apart from
it. It’s about reducing the stigma and acknowledging that we are an
inclusive society in this country.” ❤

I’m sure it’s only a matter of time before I’m knighted too, for acceptance of the industry. I’ve done so much to normalise buying and selling brutal assaults. Check my #hitbabies tag, I give lots of advice to folx new to working in the industry and to make it sound nice and glamorous.
I advocate for those of us who choose and enjoy our work, and for our clients, who are all really lovely people and actually very sweet, shy men who would never hurt a fly. That’s why they hire us hitmen to do it for them!

Sir Gaspar of Kensington, for services to rehabilitating the violence industry’s public reputation. Watch out for the New Year honours list! ^_-

Lovely, tolerant ~Amsterdam~

Sorry I’ve been out of contact for a little while, frxends and allies! Dmitry’s been trying to avoid having his head kicked in by Wee Malkie, and, similarly, I’ve been trying to avoid Madison, the CIA assassin and non-man whom I don’t find attractive and yet keeps trying to talk to me. It’s awkward and upsetting.

So we decided to get away for a well-earned city break, and hopped on the Eurostar to Amsterdam. It’s a much more liberal, tolerant city than London. It’s world-famous for acceptance of the violence industry. Hitmen can operate much more freely – we even managed to mix business and pleasure and do a little bit of short-term contracting while we were there.

I had a bit of a kerfuffle with the electrics there. Trust me to forget to bring my European adaptor… -_-;; We sorted it with a penknife and a bit of electrical tape though, only a temporary setback!

Every year, thousands of tourists and workers come from miles around to enjoy Amsterdam’s violence industry, whether it’s settling vendettas, negotiating contracts or trying out fun, new torture techniques that we just don’t get in our stuffy old home countries.

Dmitry took this nice photo of us outside the Amsterdam Dungeon! ^_^

It’s a happy, cheerful celebration of torture and execution, if a bit silly. Dmitry didn’t think it was gory enough, but I enjoyed it.

Important advice for tourists: On the eastern side of the city, there’s a bunch of boring, worthy memorials and museums depicting torture and execution as a bad thing. A lot of the Netherlands and Dutch East Indies were occupied by the Nazis and Imperial Japan in WWII, and the invading armies killed a lot of the local people and subjected them to much the same things we do in our industry, which are apparently “war crimes” or something O_o??

But that’s all in the past, and is nothing like Amsterdam’s thriving violence industry today! Mainly because there isn’t a war on, and the police won’t try to stop you.

So if you stay away from all the boring stuff, and stick to the central districts where all the best violence is, you won’t feel guilty! ^_^ Have fun!

patchworkheart:

alucards-fine-ass:

auntiewanda:

respectthefemalebody:

Feminism is about burning down the PornHub and Kink.com headquarters.

Just say it’s your kink and watch the libfems ideologically malfunction.

are we not going to talk about how PornHub offers comprehensive sexual education to those who are deprived in schools?

imagine hating that people masturbate so much

XD

Also, PornHub funds scholarships for women in STEM fields and has their own snow plow service because they saw the Gov’t sucks at their job

Like

Imagine hating sex workers so much you want to destroy a company that employs sex workers and uses profits to better the lives of the people

Thank-you for supporting our industry!
😊 Speaking as a self-described extreme BDSM breath play specialist, I’m freelance, but a lot of my colleagues were made redundant when Screwdriver Smith was imprisoned for a string of killings. He managed several assassins! 😢 (What was he supposed to do instead of profiting from murder anyway? Go back into financial services?)

Our clients are perfectly lovely, normal people! The reason they hire us is that they don’t want to commit murder themselves, so they outsource it to us. They’re not violent psychopaths (an ableist slur, bt-dubs) just because they want to pay for violence, and sometimes want to watch it by demanding evidence of the hit. Plus, they better the lives of so many by donating the odd few quid to charities, and keeping the streets safe from rival gangsters on their turf.

Besides, it’s not like it’s real violence anyway. We’re selling a fantasy! (Well, I mean, the target is definitely dead, but the fantasy is that I didn’t do it.) And then I sell that fantasy to the police and any potential witnesses. (Anyway, lots of people enjoy target shooting, and it’s impossible to do that without using a person as the target – imagine hating everybody who likes sports! -_-;;)

Admittedly, I might not exactly represent everyone in my industry (e.g. all the child soldiers and conscripts you hear about now and again who might not want to commit murders), but imagine hating them so much that you would stop their employment! And if they don’t agree, they should get a blog and a marketing department of their own to put their side of the story.

Thank-you for being such a great ally to us! ^_^ I’d like to offer you a 10% discount on a future hit, so that’s £9,000 in used notes or into my Swiss bank account. Just let me know the target’s name and last known address, and provide a photo if possible (of the target, not of yourself please – after an unfortunate mix-up recently, I’ve had to start making that clear! ^_- )

#NotYourRescueProject

After seeing Guro onto his flight back home at Heathrow, I got myself some breakfast and Bombay Sapphire in the Three Bells. As I ate, I idly wondered how Screwdriver Smith’s getting on in prison. He’s currently serving a 35-year sentence for a string of killings, apparently committed with some kind of short bladed weapon.

Being the social media-savvy chap I am, I looked him up. I don’t know if Screws has Internet access in Belmarsh, but he’ll be happy to know his business empire is doing great! I found one of his employees, Manish, on Twitter:

I haven’t seen Manish or heard anything from him in ages, so I’m glad to see he’s alright! I was worried about him, after Screws had him roughed up for making a mistake and not ordering enough CS gas and stun guns for him. Well, judging by his Twitter bio, his English has clearly improved a lot in the few months since then, so hopefully it won’t happen again.

And Screws must have promoted him pretty fast, he certainly didn’t smoke cigars when I last saw him. 🤑

Good for him!
😊

I absolutely love that hashtag too: #NotYourRescueProject! What a great rallying cry for our industry!

People often criticise me for being privileged and unrepresentative of the violence industry overall, but Manish is a person of colour and used to operate at a much lower rank than me (he was Screws’s bagman, last I heard), and his Twitter says he loves his job.

So I’m very happy to be able to use him as an example to shut down criticism! ^_^ As he requested in his bio, I’ll leave him alone and not bother checking up on him. I’m such a good ally to him.

femsev:

Sex trafficking laws assume that all underage sex workers are exploited young girls who have been forced into such work by a vicious pimp. But does this actually reflect the experience of most young, domestic sex workers? Using ethnographic research from Atlantic City and New York City, Anthony Marcus, Chris Thomas, and Amber Horning find that underage sex workers have much more agency in their relationships with pimps than many assume[…]

*rubs eyes*

Yup. It’s real.

It certainly is real! This is a fabulous article: when talking about children working in the industry, it really focuses on their individuality, consent and agency.
👍

In this context, I mean “agency” as in their free, individual choice, not “agency” as I usually mean it to mean “manager/employer/market facilitator”, or “pimp” as they so crudely put it in the article. That really surprised me, the writers are usually very good at using the correct language (e.g. “relationship” instead of the clearly problematic term “exploitation”, and “underage sex worker” instead of “child rape victim”).

“
There are, of course, violent and otherwise abusive pimps: approximately
5 percent of the pimps in the pimp study described such an approach to
pimping.”

The focus on self-identification is great – really, it’s up to the manager to say whether or not they identify as violent. It’s essentialist to assume their violence status for them based on their behaviour or criminal actions.

And indeed, in Figure 1, we see only 7.4% of underage sex workers identified as having a market facilitator.
(A total of 44.2% were initiated into the sex industry by a friend or a relative, but he/she/zxe chooses not to identify as a pimp. Much like when people used to assume Screwdriver Smith was my “handler” just because he kept assigning me contracts and telling me to “do the hit, Gaspar, or the council’ll find your teeth in the next fatberg they dig out of the fucking sewer”, when he was actually my very good friend!)

At all levels, pimps were constantly faced with the danger of being
abandoned for another pimp, an escort agency, or independent work.

It’s rare that you see the dangers faced by the managers being acknowledged. There’s always a horrific danger that they could lose some of their income!
😧

I appreciate that. I’m also glad the researchers were very positive about the overwhelming 5.6% of underage sex workers who don’t want to leave the industry. I don’t want to leave the sexualised violence industry, so it’s good to see that it represents my interests.
🙂

And I bet
all the SKERFs will argue I’m not representative of these sex workers

because I’m 35 and live in a penthouse flat in Kensington and could probably work somewhere else if I liked, but that’s my choice – there’s nothing stopping any of these children from buying a flat here too, attending an elite university (Carradine College, Oxford, in my case), and networking with employers in other industries.
In fact, Dmitry’s old flat is on the market right now for £1.2 mil. He had to move suddenly and unexpectedly, so he’s lowered the price, hoping for a quick sale. Top floor, 47 Foucault Road. Snap it up, it’s a bargain!

Parliament’s inquiry into the sex industry is misguided and one-sided

Today I am very happy and validated, because I found a rare article in the liberal news media that actually supports the sexualised violence industry: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/26/pop-up-brothels-inquiry-one-sided-sex-workers-criminalisation-nordic-model Yay! ^_^

“An investigation into “pop-up brothels” – short-term lets in which people sell sex – was launched by the all-party parliamentary group on prostitution on Monday…
From its outset the inquiry has distanced itself from the living,
breathing people who sell sex. The UK’s estimated 80,000 sex workers are
reduced to “prostituted women”, their work seen solely as “commercial sexual exploitation”. There seems little room for nuance.”

How dare the government reduce empowered, independent sex workers to mere victims or survivors? Suggesting that any of us suffer violence or don’t consent to our careers is offensive! I love my job, and no amount of trafficking victims and their lived experience can ever erase that.

“The UK desperately needs further inquiries into the sex industry. We
need to know the extent to which austerity is driving women into
prostitution, we need to look honestly at whether immigration policies
create the conditions for trafficking. There is a still a huge gap in
knowledge around the basic makeup of the industry; we need statistics on
who works, where they work, and how.”

Weeell, that’s maybe going a bit too far. How are we supposed to celebrate everyone’s free choice to enter the industry if we investigate whether or not some people are forced into it by poverty or trafficking? (And anyway, how would it affect me? I don’t care whether or not other people are forced into it, that’s their problem.)

In fact, the inquiry’s terms of reference indicate that it is interested
only in “pop-up brothels”, in particular those run by criminal gangs.

That’s better. If we’re interested in finding out about pimping or trafficking, we shouldn’t be looking into criminal gangs. I used to work for a so-called “criminal gang”, and I consented to everything we did! Apart from a couple of times when Sid “The Snake” made me do a hit that we hadn’t agreed on

By narrowing the goalposts of who will be deemed representative of the
industry, the parliamentary group has ensured the vast majority of
workers are silenced.

See? The vast majority of workers don’t work in pop-up brothels or for criminal gangs! I don’t know when this research was done (given the huge gap in knowledge around the basic makeup of the industry) but it’s good to know.

Sex workers don’t use the cringeworthy, hipster term “pop-up brothel”,
but working from short-term lets is common. Either independently or for
managers, sex workers travel for work.

The author is a good ally. I’m always pleased to see the correct language being used, “manager” instead of “pimp” or “handler”, and “sex worker” instead of “trafficking victim” or “stranglewank hitman”.

“Pop-up brothels”, in as much as they exist, are so demonstrably an
effect of criminalisation, this inquiry has already shot itself in the
foot.

This is exactly the reason I have to keep moving to new safehouses, to avoid arrest and prosecution for committing murders. And my clients are always having to pay off or avoid the police, to stop them arresting them for hiring me! Clients who pay for murders, and clients who pay for sex under economic coercion, should be decriminalised!

That exploitation happens in sex work is disputed by no one, least of all sex workers. And danger only increases when people are unable to work from a stable base.

Not to judge our clients or anything; they’re perfectly nice people who shouldn’t be criminalised. But yes, sometimes they do try to “silence” me, or threaten to break my legs if I don’t do a job for them, or refuse to pay me. That still doesn’t mean they deserve to be criminalised though! Really, to blame any one group of people in particular for the danger and exploitation would be wrong. I wouldn’t want anyone to think badly of our clients, managers or agencies. (Though if you’re going to blame someone, blame the mean, bitchy, dried-up old “feminists” who want to send those nice people to prison!)

Worryingly, the parliamentary group has not made links with any
sex-worker-led organisations, and no current sex workers have been
included in framing the initial terms of reference.

I’ve been saying this for a long time now. If someone’s not currently involved in the industry, they have no stake in the issue, since it doesn’t affect them any more. Being a sex worker doesn’t cause any lasting harm, so why should it still affect them?

Each member is strongly in favour of criminalisation in the form of the Nordic model – in which anyone paying for sex is a criminal, and sex workers bodies’ become, by definition, scenes of a crime. This despite sex-worker-led organisations around the world
criticising the approach. The Nordic model adds another layer of
criminalisation to the transaction – so anyone who supports it supports
criminalisation.

Emphasis mine. If you support criminalising me and my clients, you support criminalising my targets! I’m sure everyone agrees it would be ridiculous to criminalise a murder victim, so why would you criminalise me for committing it or my clients for hiring me? Same goes for all crimes, you can’t criminalise the perpetrator without criminalising the victim. That’s just how the legal system works.

We need balance not bigotry. Not one member of the parliamentary group
will be affected by the results of this inquiry, but thousands of sex
workers will. Why, yet again, are so many being excluded?

Well, fortunately, I frequent many of the same clubs as Members of Parliament and drink in the same bars, so hopefully I’ll be able to influence them a bit!
😉

And if any sex workers want to criminalise their clients (e.g. workers who are trafficked or economically coerced or addicted to drugs or underage), perhaps they could also write a nice article for The Guardian, or use their influence and contacts to put both sides of the issue to the government.

Thank-you for your allyship!
🤗

I’ll do my best to influence the government to support decriminalising our lovely clients!

Strangulation: What You Need to Know

stranglewankhitman:

Another article in my #hitbabies series! I’m going to teach you a bit about the profession.

When it comes to your target’s body, it’s important that you have the facts. With that sentiment in mind, I’m here to lay it all out for you when it comes to strangulation.

It’s important that we talk about all kinds of violent murders, because not everyone is doing, or wants to have, “non-violent” careers. If you don’t want to kill people, but your agency is pressuring you into it, or someone more powerful than you is blackmailing you to make you do a hit, it’s helpful to know the facts.

If you’re not comfortable reading about murder, that’s perfectly OK, too, but it would make you a murderphobic, intolerant, old-fashioned SKERF, so, your choice.

Obviously there is a lot of stuff on the Internet about murder, but what about young people? What about the so-called “child soldiers” who need to know about this for their job (and who are entirely consenting to a career in the murder industry)?

This is strangulation 101, for youngsters, beginners, and all inquisitive folk.

Why strangulation?
Strangulation, though often stigmatised, is a perfectly natural way to kill. Seriously, animals in the wild kill by compressing their prey’s throat, and boa constrictors kill by asphyxiation. So if you’re a little worried about trying it or can’t understand why anyone would do it, just know that you’re in the minority and you’re wrong.

That being said, strangulation is not enjoyed by everyone, particularly the target, and that’s OK.

The appeal of strangulation when the target has a laryngeal prominence
For targets with a laryngeal prominence, you can have a great and easy experience by using their laryngeal prominence as a guide for placement of your ligature.

First of all: What is a laryngeal prominence? It is a piece of cartilage over the larynx, also known as the “Adam’s apple”, It feels like a solid, small bulge.

The appeal of strangulation when the target does not have a laryngeal prominence
Just because the target doesn’t have a laryngeal prominence does not mean murder is off-limits. In theory, violence against non-laryngeal prominence owners is taboo, but in practice, it’s actually considered quite normal and encouraged. Many laryngeal prominence owners love committing violence against non-laryngeal proninence owners and often get away with it, or even pressure the target into letting them do it! (If you’re reading this and you’re a non-laryngeal prominence owner and you don’t want to be choked, what’s wrong with you, you mean old SKERF?)

[edit: Safety
I forgot to mention this bit – make sure you use gloves and protect your hands. If you’re using piano wire without protection, you could cut through your own fingers, so don’t do that. Also the target might fight back or summon their goons and kill you, and you might get arrested and get life in prison or executed depending on your local laws. But whatever, that stuff’s boring and unglamorous, so back to the fun stuff!]

Start slow – seriously
Here is the real deal. You can’t just decide you’re going to kill someone one day and then go for it.

Nope. Not a great idea. If you want to make the kill look like it was self-inflicted, like an auto-erotic asphyxiation, you need to start slowly. Silence the target first by compressing the
larynx, gently. You don’t want to leave marks at this point. Start with
your hand or arm, then use your ligature.

remember to place the ligature above the larynx (use the laryngeal prominence as a guide, if the target owns one), and pull the ligature up and under the mandible.

If you’re in a hurry and you’re not concerned about getting caught after the fact, you can skip straight to the ligature strangulation. Slip it over the target’s head and pull hard and quickly so they can’t shout for back-up.

Yes, there might be some blood
Forgive me for waiting until the very end of this piece to get to this burning question, but I wanted you to know the benefits and positives when it comes to strangulation. Because there are many!
I want to personally assure you that you will not get covered in blood during strangulation. Sure, there are horror stories about people getting murdered and abused, and killing somehow being a bad thing, but aren’t there always? Who cares about those victims, right? They just weren’t doing it right, or they weren’t open-minded enough to enjoy the violence!

That being said, yes, if you’re using a thin wire, you might cut the target and come into contact with some blood. You are cutting the carotid artery. It is where blood flows. It’s NOT a big deal. Everybody bleeds. Everyone has a circulatory system.

Murder can be awesome, and if you want to give it a go, you do that. More power to you.

This article has been updated to include the importance of using protection during strangulation and not accidentally cutting your own fingers off or being murdered in self-defence by the target or being caught by law enforcement. Whoops!

Oh fuck, I forgot to label the trachea in the anatomy diagram. Ah well, never mind. It’s not like the trachea’s all that important for breathing, right?

It’s 2017 and I’m STILL having to explain my work

So my old Yakuza friend Guro Kagaisha was in town to launder some money through the London property market. So we met up and went for a drink, and he said, “Hey Gaspar, remind me what it is you do again?”
“Well, Guro,” said I, “I’m a sex worker specialising in extreme breath play.”
“Oh, yeah, I remember now, you’re a stranglewank hitman,” said he, not very politically correctly, I might add. “So, let me ask you this: do you guys actually give the target a handbeezy or just make it look like you did?”

I was seriously grumpy at that point. It is not my job to educate Guro or anybody, but on this one occasion I said, “buy me a treble Langley’s and a packet of sea salt and balsamic vinegar Kettle Chips and I shall consider doing the emotional labour for you”.

Anyway, as I said to Guro after he’d bought me the required compensation for my emotional labour: I do not “actually give the target a handbeezy”, no. Nor do I make it look as though I did. I choke the target to death, and then I make it look as though the target did it to himself/herself/xorself by accident during a sexual misadventure. The only sexual aspect to it is when I arrange the body post-mortem and put the corpse’s own hand down his/her/xer chinos.

“So,” said Guro, taking a sip of his whisky, “you don’t really do any sex shit then?”
“No, Guro, I do not really do any sex shit,” I sighed.
“So you’re not a sex worker, then, are you?”

Well, I had had just about enough of his gatekeeping, invalidating bullshit by then. How dare he challenge my status as a sex worker?

I AM a sex worker. Sure, I’m not actually selling sex or exposing myself in any way, but what I am selling is the fantasy of erotic asphyxiation. I sell that fantasy to the target’s contacts, and to the police. And that gives me an interest in the industry and the right to speak over people who don’t have inside knowledge about the industry (e.g. former sex workers, survivors, trafficking victims who aren’t involved in it any more and hence have no stake in the issue whatsoever, people still in the industry who don’t want to be there, and people who disagree with me about full legalisation of the sexual violence industry).

Anyway, fortunately, Guro is very good at self-crit. When he was a hitbaby and made a mistake on a job, he even cut off bits of his fingers as part of his self-critting for his boss! What a great ally! ^_^ So he said a big sorry to me and we hung around outside Bank-Monument station for a bit, where he bought me a few grams of coke as compensation for hurting my feelings and invalidating my identity.

So now we’re friends again! 🙂 We’re going to spend the rest of his visit buying houses, planning how to get revenge on Dmitry for poisoning me with polonium (even if it did result in my super edgy new trendsetting fashionqueering haircut), and I’ll introduce him to my pet pigs. Should be a nice relaxing week.

liberal-lesbophobia:

“mom, dad… I’m not non-queer”

What makes this article problematic is that it perpetuates the queer/heterosexual binary. I’m heterosexual, and I identify as queer! The reason is, I’m a sex worker, I do sadistic kinky murders for a living, and sex work, kink and BDSM are inherently queer (and therefore I’m allowed to say that word). Our mainstream, Western cultural view of sexuality hardly ever involves violence or money, and therefore by bucking those trends, I am queer.

At least that’s how I understand it.
😕

I don’t know if homosexual or bisexual people’s lives entirely revolve around fetishizing violence,
but mine certainly does, so if doesn’t centre it, then it’s excluding me, and that’s clearly wrong for so many reasons.

Apart from that, I entirely agree with the article. I’m not non-queer; I am a brave, beautiful, straight man who likes to kill people and make it look like an auto-erotic asphyxiation, and I am proud to be myself!
😊