Tag: skerf

radicalmathematical:

fuwwy-scientwisht:

If you’re a TERF you’re a murderer, congratulations, you’re apart of the force that’s caused so many innocent children to commit suicide. Rot.

This is the most inaccurate post on this entire website.

STOP
👏

USING
👏

MURDERER
👏

AS
👏

A
👏

SLUR

I’m a murderer*, and I fully support feminism that includes ALL genders and identities! People like you are the reason hitmen end up at the bottom of the Thames, feet encased in concrete.

How dare you compare me to assigned-female-at-births who selfishly demand human rights for themselves and don’t bother to get them for the rest of us as well?

*note: I’ve never been convicted, so don’t take this as a confession plz kthx
😉

discourseful:

discourseful:

this is literally THE SINGULAR funniest fucking comment about kink i have EVER on this website

MOM IM 13 AND I NEED TO ASK YOU ABOUT BONDAGE?

As someone heavily involved in the “underworld scene”, I wish I could have had conversations like these with my parents.

In fact, I had exactly the conversation in F) when I was but a boy of eight. Mother said, “Gaspar, dear, the nanny tells me you tied up next door’s cat and poked it with a stick, and she’s very upset. What do you have to say for yourself?”
If only I’d felt able to say “Mother, you keep talking negatively about bondage and inflicting pain, and it hurts my feelings”! But being a mere child, without access to kink-positive resources, I lacked the words to express myself and be truly understood.

Instead I shrugged and said “I like hurting things”. And she sent me to my room, the kinkphobic SKERFy bitch.

Disabled ♿️ men 👨 are entitled ❤️👍to pay 💷 for hits 🔪🔫

Lots of SKERFs say that nobody should pay for assassinations, and the contract killing industry shouldn’t exist, and we hitmen (and hit-non-men) should do something other job instead. And that’s all very well,

But what about disabled men?

You can’t answer that one, can you, radfems?
The fact of the matter is this: if a disabled man gets the urge to kill, he’s simply not capable of acting on his desires without help. For example, if his hands are all deformed and gross, he won’t be able to hold the ligature tight enough around the target’s neck to kill them. And if he’s retarded or a schizo or something, he probably won’t think of using poison or anything like that. So they literally have to pay someone to do it for them.

That’s where we provide a very important service, making differently-abled folx’s dreams a reality. ^_^ Specifically, rage fantasies about murdering people!

You see, real feminists (like my good self) understand and empathise with the disabled. That’s just how intersectionality works.

Now BOTH main parties support me! <3

I’ve always supported the Conservative Party, because they have traditionally supported white-collar criminals like me. And indeed, they continue to give that support even through such turbulent times for the party: they have proposed the Gender Recognition Act, which will allow identity-fluid assigned-male-at-births such as my good self to enter spaces as we please, according to our chosen identities, without anyone challenging us!

Many of us were concerned about the possibility of a Labour government, which might oppose such measures. After all, historically, they’ve discriminated against me by prioritising the rights of women and poor people over me and my friends, and they’ve over-regulated “dangerous” and “violent” industries that “cause harm” and all that irrelevant, problematic, offensive stuff.

But just today, I heard that another person of fluid identity who supports and tolerates violence has successfully infiltrated the Labour Party! ^_^ Lily Madigan, a 19-year-old who enjoys bullying women and merrily joking about rape and child molestation, managed to sneak in, identifying as a feminist (nice touch, heh ^_-), and was so good at it that she actually replaced the incumbent! Yassss!

She has an interesting technique, I must say: when questioned about her support for violence and abuse, she didn’t try to apologise or run away, she doubled down and claimed that it was all made up to discredit her. I can’t believe that worked, that takes some chutzpah! I wish I had the nerve to try that myself. Perhaps next time someone accuses me of being an assassin in disguise, I’ll say “well, clearly this is a conspiracy to make me LOOK like a violent creep. You shouldn’t believe everything you hear.” (And then I’ll murder them.)

So now that we have a representative in the Labour Party (as a women’s officer, no less! Take that, SKERFs!) I’m hoping that it’s only a matter of time before my profession is accepted and legalised.
Though, Ms. Madigan, if you’re reading this, now that you’re in, please, do own up to the rape jokes and the bullying. We want’ to de-stigmatise violence, and you can’t do that if you keep acting like it’s a bad thing. Be proud of your work and your beliefs! ^_^

In fact, you’ve more than earned it – have a hit on me! Well, not ON me, obvs, I mean, I’ll do the hit, free of charge. Just let me know the target’s name and last known address and I’ll take care of them! ❤

(I must admit, I’m a bit uneasy about the rape thing, but you do you, it’s not for me to judge. Shine on, you crazy diamond! ^_^ I just do murders, is that okay?)

My neighbour is a SKERF

Ugggh. I literally can’t even with my next door neighbour right now. My current target works in the financial services office across the street, and her balcony would make a perfect vantage point from which I could shoot him.
So I knocked on her door and politely asked if I could set up a sniper nest on her balcony, and would she bring me some tea and sandwiches periodically throughout the evening, because he doesn’t always leave work at the same time every day so I could be waiting a long time and it gets quite cold out there?
(trigger warning: woman conducting literal violence against me)

SHE
SAID
NO

(0___0)

I thought I’d be used to such appalling treatment by now, but it still hurts every time. TT_TT These uppity bitches like my neighbour seem to think they have the right to tell identityfluid assigned-male-at-births intent on committing violence that we can’t come in. And even worse, if we do manage to get in, they won’t prioritise our needs over their own selfishness. I could FREEZE TO DEATH or STARVE out there without tea and sandwiches!

Well, I’ll show her. There’s a ledge that goes around the building, so I should be able to sneak onto her balcony and set up and take the shot without her noticing. I shall just have to go without sustenance, and watch my footing on the ledge. If I fall to my death out there, it will be ALL YOUR FAULT, MS. HENDERSON. I hope you can live with yourself. In fact, I hereby bequeath you what remains of my industrial tin of Swarfega, to wash off my BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS. (FWIW, it works a treat on literal blood! ^_^ )

Here’s a little comic strip I made, all about how you can be a good ally to your favourite empowered, independent, high-class extreme breath play specialist! ^_^

It’s not difficult. All you have to do is shut the fuck up and let me get on with doing my thing, no matter how dangerous it may be to myself and others! I know what I’m talking about better than you do, so just trust me on everything, okay

If you’re trying to say lesbians can’t like dick For starters doesn’t have to be anything sexual in the relationship And either way lesbians are wlw and trans women are (shockingly) women

evilguacamole:

glow-cats:

evilguacamole:

glow-cats:

evilguacamole:

glow-cats:

evilguacamole:

iloveradfems:

spencer-shayy:

izzy-pea:

So you’re saying lesbians (who don’t like dick) should be in sexless relationships with males to work around the fact that they aren’t attracted to them? Do you realise how homophobic that is?

Here’s the thing you rape-promoting trans activists can’t wrap your tiny minds around. Nobody is obligated to talk to, befriend, date, and/or sleep with anyone. Nobody is owed any of that. Not transwomen, not transmen, not “cis” people. Nobody.

NO MEANS NO.

It might be a shocker for you but lesbians not only don’t like dick but they also LIKE and want vulvas, what’s the solution for that?Lesbians ignoring their desires to be with a male?

The lesbians I know define their orientation by liking women, not genitals.

That’s what we used to do, until the trans movement started redefining our words. 🙂

Y’all are using feminism to promote anti queer, ultra conservative hate mongering. You don’t get to talk about redefining words, you walking sack of garbage. Fuck off.

What the fuck is “anti queer”?

The trans movement is actually the “ultra conservative hate mongering” group, as you’ve so kindly put it. You constantly fucking harass and degrade lesbians into dating men, you violate women’s boundaries and guilt us into prioritising men. But do tell me how my feminism is the one that’s conservative.

I DO get to talk about redefining words, because it directly affects me. I can’t call myself a lesbian without 100 people screaming at me that if I don’t include men I’m a disgusting mistake, and that I deserve to be raped. What the hell am I, if not a lesbian? There’s no word to describe my sexuality anymore, because the trans movement has warped its meaning into another useless fucking term for bisexual.

But yeah.. I guess I’M the walking sack of garbage because my feminism prioritises women. Whatever helps you sleep at night, you disgusting homophobe.

Mmm. Yes. Now which of us are the republicans going to for legislation advice? Oh right, TERFs.

Trans women are women. Nothing you’ve said is relevant to the conversation because you are talking about men. You define women by a patriarchal sexual binary where sex organs trump any feminist ideas on gender. It’s industrialist, colonialist and misogynist to adhere to such poor understandings of gender. Your feminism sucks.

You are a lesbian who excludes lesbians because you adhere to patriarchal values. Anyone who says you must date some person is terrible and rape that’s are never okay. But regardless of dating preference you are still a bigot and a terrible person. I mean, I don’t care who you date: if you say trans women aren’t women you suck, you’re a bigot, a tool of conservatives and a blight on feminism. If you did date a trans woman and said they weren’t a woman you wouldn’t be any better a person. I’ve still never seen anyone ever even say this shit. What trans woman wants to be with a TERF? I don’t know anyone who’d want to be with a TERF other than another TERF. And I know a ton of lesbians, cis and trans. Every lesbian I know would rather date a man than a TERF.

You are still a lesbian. A really shitty one. Similar to one that wouldn’t date fat women or Black women. You’re still a lesbian though. You’re the one that wants bigotry to be part of your sexual identity. Why do you care if other lesbians would date trans women? You only want to date those who’ve never touched a peepee or something? Please, you’re like a man who doesn’t want a woman who’s touched someone else’s dick before his.

Your feminism prioritizes men’s views of what makes a woman. Which isn’t feminism at all. You can call me homophobic, but it doesn’t change that you are a bigot and trans women are women.

“Your feminism prioritizes men’s views of what makes a woman” so you obviously have no idea what radical feminism is, making everything else you said irrelevant lmfao. What are you basing your information on? Tumblr? I think it’s time to branch out.

Come back to me when you actually know what you’re talking about.

The patriarchy defines women by genitals, in binary and by breeding function. As do you.

You do not understand what a woman is and you are a tool of the patriarchy to maintain your ignorance and bigotry. You treat trans women as men treat all women: you do not trust them, you do not trust them to understand their bodies, you do not give them the freedom to be themselves, you wish to deny their bodily autonomy, you deny them their sexuality and their humanity. All to maintain your frail status quo.

I know what a “radical feminist” is. They are the cancer of feminism.

So happy to see this tagged #terfscanchoke! ^_^ Speaking as an identity-fluid assigned-male-at-birth with a history of committing strangulation murders and who is currently, woefully unlucky in love, it’s nice to see I’m not alone.

When most assigned-female-at-births find out about my criminal history and current employment status as a hitman (some very personal information which I TRUSTED THEM WITH), they either make their excuses and leave, or they start screaming and flee (rude!). And then I have to go back to my lonely, empty Kensington penthouse, and that’s denying me my sexuality and therefore my humanity! TT_TT I mean, I’ve always got my sexy scrapbook of photographs of things I’ve set fire to, but it’s just not the same without someone to share it with. Those selfish bitches.

I feel really offended when women don’t trust me. Perhaps they’ve encountered other violent AMABs in the past, or they’ve lived a life of seeing AFABs being blamed for violence against them committed by AMABs, and they’re judging me by the same standards. But I have never assaulted anyone without a contract. If anything, that makes me much safer to be around!

Anyway, I feel really pleased and validated and quite excited to see a celebration of people choking to death and recognition of my right to acquiescence, and of other people’s boundaries as the problematic obstacles that they are! ^_^  Actually, my former agency has been looking to replace me since I went freelance. You’d be a great fit! If you don’t mind the fact that most of the targets tend to be AMABs (they’re usually arms dealers, spies or organised crime bosses) rather than feminists, I could put in a good word for you with Sid “The Snake” if you like?

Thank-you for your allyship! ❤

alexandriasfx:

Bdsm is not abuse

Jessica Ruiz

https://www.verywell.com/difference-between-bdsm-and-abuse-4065395

BDSM, an acronym for “bondage, discipline/dominance, submission, and sadomasochism” is often misunderstood by the general public. One of the most common misconceptions is that BDSM is dangerous, reckless, and abusive. However, when practiced properly, BDSM is very different than intimate partner abuse.

For decades, BDSM practitioners have maintained that kink is safe, satisfying, and can positively affect both a participant’s sexual desires and their well-being. Over the last few years, science has confirmed these claims. Recent studies have uncovered the many health benefits of BDSM. Researchers have found that those who engage in BDSM activities have better mental health, more satisfaction in their relationships, and less stress than their vanilla-sex counterparts.

Those unfamiliar with BDSM were surprised by a new study from Northern Illinois University, which revealed that those involved in BDSM are more consent-minded when it comes to sex acts and less likely to conform to behaviors associated with rape culture. Practitioners of BDSM displayed “significantly lower levels of benevolent sexism, rape myth acceptance, and victim-blaming.” In other words, they respect the boundaries of their partner and are less likely to cross the boundaries of personal safety.

Even though studies show that BDSM clearly has positive benefits, many who look at these extreme behaviors from the outside perceive this type of sexual behavior as abusive, chaotic, and out of control. Abusive behavior should never be part of the BDSM dynamic, but how can we tell the difference?   

Consent Differentiates BDSM From Abuse

Consent is the cornerstone of all BDSM activity, and it’s one of the major factors that differentiates it from abuse. Put simply, BDSM is consensual. Abuse is not.

Before each BDSM “scene,“ participants express and negotiate their likes, desires, and limits. This means that all involved in the agreed-upon sex act set specific goals determining what they want to get out of the session—both emotionally and physically. They also discuss what are referred to as “hard and soft limits.” Hard limits are the things you would never engage in, while soft limits are things you might experiment with if and when the time feels right. Playing with the boundaries of soft limits requires deeper negotiation prior to beginning a session. 

Pre-scene negotiation can take many forms. Sometimes participants write out a contract detailing what is specifically allowed and forbidden. Others use a simple checklist of activities. They then discuss each item individually, indicating which is a desire or a limit. Others simply have an in-depth conversation about their boundaries.

BDSM Is Safe, Sane, and Consensual.

Those involved in BDSM often use the phrase “safe, sane, and consensual” to describe their type of sex play. Any play that is defined as “kink” but doesn’t incorporate the agreed-upon safe, sane and consensual elements may very well be abusive.

Safe means participants have taken precautions to minimize risks. It also means that participants are knowledgeable about the techniques and tools being used, which can eliminate both unwanted fear and dangerous behavior.

Sane indicates that those involved are in a state that allows them to separate fantasy from reality. This also means sobriety; senses and behaviors are not being impaired by the influence of intoxicants. Lastly, it implies refraining from imposing unrealistic expectations on your partner.

Consent means all parties have discussed and agree on boundaries. Equally as important, consent must be on-going. In other words, if an individual wishes to change their mind about any activity during play they can renegotiate at any time.

Communication Is Key.

Clear communication is imperative to practicing healthy BDSM. Safewords are standard fare in this type of play and a major element that differentiates BDSM from abuse. A safeword is a word or phrase that signals that one of the players either wishes to take a break or stop completely. An example of a safeword might be “red,” “banana”—or any other thing you wouldn’t normally say during sex or in the context of a scene. Additionally, if a Submissive is gagged or a Dominant’s hearing is impaired, safe signals can be used instead. This could be a gesture or something the Submissive holds in their hand and drops signaling their wish to pause the scene.

Important Differences Between Abuse and BDSM

Kinky play can involve things like punishment, humiliation, and even tears. This may seem like abuse to an outsider, making it understandably difficult to tell the difference between the two. However, when compared side by side with BDSM, we can see the stark differences.

Abusive episodes are out of control situations. In healthy BDSM, a Dominant never acts spontaneously out of anger. Scenes are pre-planned with care, thought, and with the best interest of the Submissive in mind.

Abusive situations usually end with negative emotions. A BDSM scene is designed to leave the participants feeling good and satisfied when it’s over. It’s a Dominant’s responsibility to give after-care when the session is over to make sure the Submissive feels happy, safe, and secure. In contrast, both the target and the abuser feel sad, angry, or ashamed following an abusive episode.

Abusive situations are often accompanied by substance abuse or emotional impairment. In healthy BDSM, players try to minimize anything that may affect their judgement during play—including the use of drugs or alcohol.

Abuse in BDSM Although recent studies have found those involved in BDSM are less likely to tolerate certain types of abuse, it can still happen. Abusive red flags in a BDSM relationship or scene are very similar to those found in other types of relationships. Some warning behaviors include: ignoring sexual boundaries non-consensual/non-negotiated verbal or physical abuse controlling behavior, including excessive jealousy unpredictable extreme mood swings substance abuse use of ultimatums and fear to control the victim isolating the victim from family and friends a history of abusive behavior with close contacts. If you recognize these or other signs of abuse in your own BDSM encounters, get outside help. If abuse occurs at a public BDSM event, seek out a Designated or Dungeon Monitor (DM). For private play with a new partner, always establish a safe call with a friend. Also, it isn’t unusual for those actively involved in the BDSM community to ask for references from previous partners.

@respectthefemalebody

This makes me feel very happy and validated!
😊

For most of my life, I was “in the closet”, so to speak, about my love of committing sexualised violence. You could say it’s exactly like homosexuals’ experience, or that of someone with a different sexual fetish (one which doesn’t involve assaulting people). The life of an extreme breath play practitioner such as myself is a lonely one, burdened with shame, from my parents, my school masters, the mental health services, the police and the judiciary. Fortunately when I was learning my craft, I had an excellent manager (Sid “The Snake” from Chelsea), and he helped teach me how to make my assassinations look like an auto-erotic asphyxiation gone wrong.

Sometimes, people say mean things to me like “it’s unhealthy to be aroused by committing acts of violence” and “murder is bad” (now, doesn’t that sound a lot like “thou shalt not kill”? Typical pearl-clutching, prudish SKERFs, siding with the religious right!). But what they forget is, it’s just a harmless fantasy. I mean, yes, technically, I do actually choke my targets to death for real, but the fantasy is that we’re pretending that they did it themselves by accident. (And then I sell that fantasy to the police afterwards.)

Besides, suicide is very common and has been practised throughout history – it’s completely healthy and normal to actually want to be subjected to lethal violence! So who are these SKERFs to judge the relationship I have with my clients and my targets? Leave me alone!  >_<

Anyway, the OP is not a SKERF, and is a great ally! 🤝  As recognition of your allyship, I will offer you a 20% discount on any future hits – so that brings the price down to £8,000 in used notes or transferred to my Swiss bank account. Just use the Ask box or message me for my bank details and to give me the target’s name (and their photo and last known address if possible, please)!
😉

Anarchists are Not My Allies 😞

I feel emotionally drained. I always thought anarchists were my allies, who would support my right to assume undercover identities and commit acts of sexualised lethal violence for money and prioritise my enjoyment of violence over my victims’ safety. Most anarchists I meet support BDSM and legalisation of the sex industry, so I assumed they were my friends.

I WAS WRONG. 😢

At the London Anarchist Bookfair this weekend, some nasty whores (I’m allowed to say that because I’m a sex worker) were giving out leaflets opposing my right to identify as I please and enter my targets’ spaces! Just because they were worried about how it would affect women and their safety from “male violence”. Those selfish bitches!

Here are the leaflets in question: https://sages.org.uk/publications/sages-factsheet.html  You can see for yourself how they prioritise women, children and trans people over my feelings and convenience, the scumbags.

Even worse, they’re apparently supporters of Helen Steel, who is a tireless campaigner against men changing their identity for their career, for personal gain and to violate people’s boundaries. She was targeted by and now campaigns against “spy cops” – since an undercover police officer infiltrating environmentalist and anarchist groups identified as a fellow activist and entered a relationship with her in his assumed identity.

I mean, sure, identifying as a political activist, using the name of a deceased child and engaging in a two-year relationship with a target to infiltrate a space is going a teensy bit far, but it’s nothing that assassins like me haven’t done in our time, though generally the job doesn’t involve such long-term preparation. The most I tend to do is flirt a little with any assigned-female-at-births who might be able to grant me access to my targets. Or if I’m pressed for time, I just buy them a drink and spike it, so they’re out of the way while I work.

Anyway, my point is, banning spy cops would have the unintended consequence of further criminalising me and my colleagues – as would opposing our right to choose our own identities as needed! 

Fortunately we hitmen do still have some allies – a small number of brave allies surrounded and threatened the AFABs handing the leaflets out, and quite correctly called them “cunts”. Thank you for supporting me! ^_^