Anarchists are Not My Allies 😞

I feel emotionally drained. I always thought anarchists were my allies, who would support my right to assume undercover identities and commit acts of sexualised lethal violence for money and prioritise my enjoyment of violence over my victims’ safety. Most anarchists I meet support BDSM and legalisation of the sex industry, so I assumed they were my friends.

I WAS WRONG. 😢

At the London Anarchist Bookfair this weekend, some nasty whores (I’m allowed to say that because I’m a sex worker) were giving out leaflets opposing my right to identify as I please and enter my targets’ spaces! Just because they were worried about how it would affect women and their safety from “male violence”. Those selfish bitches!

Here are the leaflets in question: https://sages.org.uk/publications/sages-factsheet.html You can see for yourself how they prioritise women, children and trans people over my feelings and convenience, the scumbags.

Even worse, they’re apparently supporters of Helen Steel, who is a tireless campaigner against men changing their identity for their career, for personal gain and to violate people’s boundaries. She was targeted by and now campaigns against “spy cops” – since an undercover police officer infiltrating environmentalist and anarchist groups identified as a fellow activist and entered a relationship with her in his assumed identity.

I mean, sure, identifying as a political activist, using the name of a deceased child and engaging in a two-year relationship with a target to infiltrate a space is going a teensy bit far, but it’s nothing that assassins like me haven’t done in our time, though generally the job doesn’t involve such long-term preparation. The most I tend to do is flirt a little with any assigned-female-at-births who might be able to grant me access to my targets. Or if I’m pressed for time, I just buy them a drink and spike it, so they’re out of the way while I work.

Anyway, my point is, banning spy cops would have the unintended consequence of further criminalising me and my colleagues – as would opposing our right to choose our own identities as needed!

Fortunately we hitmen do still have some allies – a small number of brave allies surrounded and threatened the AFABs handing the leaflets out, and quite correctly called them “cunts”. Thank you for supporting me! ^_^

^THISSSS, Y’ALL. TERFs are usually SKERFs as well (they both object to my right to identify as an innocent bystander or member of household staff for the purposes of getting close to my targets).

People are NOT just attracted to genitals. Personally, I don’t see what all the fuss is about with genitals anyway. I’m heterosexual, but if you must know, I’m somewhat attracted to the power trip when you have complete control over whether someone lives or dies (hence why I got into this industry), but tbh, primarily, I’m attracted to fire.

There’s nothing quite like enjoying some romantic candlelight with a sexual partner (generally an assigned-female-at-birth or just my good self). Watching the flames flicker and dance, curling around the wick, winking at me in the darkness, teasing me in ways that no woman ever could. At least, until whichever nasty cow I’m with at the time shames me by saying “what are you staring at? no, seriously, why can’t you ever look at me during sex?”.

Sometimes I like to build a small fire and touch and stroke the flames. They lick round my fingers like a hungry animal, blistering my skin as if they want to strip it from me. I obediently disrobe for them, shedding my blood-stained clothes and any documentary evidence of my murders, and they take them greedily. The fire eats away all the evidence of my sin, it always forgives me, and as it fades away to glowing embers, I am made pure and innocent again.

It speaks only in soothing, crackling whispers, and never uses the wrong pronouns for me or has any opinions I don’t like – or any opinions or thoughts at all, for that matter! It’s a beautiful, mindless object and I decide whether it grows or dies, as I feed it or neglect it. My perfect lover.

Even when I’m trying to interact with an assigned-female-at-birth’s genitals, I can only think about fire. I try not to show it, but the judgemental bitch is always like “is everything alright?” when I run out of matches and can’t get it up. Truth is, I’m just not interested in human contact or a partner’s body in the same way.

So it’s good to know that most people, except for TERFs and the morally equivalent sexual harassers, agree with me that genitals aren’t important for sex! ALL SEXUALITY IS NORMAL AND HEALTHY, including pyrophilia, and definitely excluding anyone who’s only interested in people with particular sorts of genitals!

WELL, I HOPE YOU’RE HAPPY, “FEMINISTS”. Your ideology is causing literal violence. I got shot (again) today.

I was trying to get into the home of an adult entertainment media oligarch to assassinate him with my usual modus operandi, and one of his security goons saw me, asked me to identify myself, and when I said “I’m the new guard, I’m here to relieve you, didn’t anyone tell you?”, he didn’t believe me and challenged my self-defined identity, and shot me!
😭

Who is really to blame for another man shooting me, while guarding a billionaire man who made his money in the porn industry? Radical feminists, of course! If you’ve ever doubted something a man said, THIS IS YOUR FAULT.

This has nothing to do with the so-called “male violence” issue that these fake feminists keep whingeing on about, and everything to do with them opposing my right to identify as a guard.

I don’t know how you can live with yourselves, you evil, murderous scum. (And not murderous in a good way, like me.) So my message is: Women, sit down and shut up about “male violence”, otherwise things like this happen.

WHEN WILL FEMINISTS START DOING SOMETHING ABOUT MAN-ON-MAN VIOLENCE? Women are supposed to take care of people, it is their responsibility to fix this!

a-door-behind-a-door:

stranglewankhitman:

a-door-behind-a-door:

down with terfs/rad fems but also down with alt-right; you both are very evil

YASSSS. Down with SKERFs and every kind of exclusionary radical feminists! I’ve been saying this for a long time: feminists who oppose my right to identify as I please and who oppose MY CHOICE to enter a career in the violence industry (along with the CHOICE of all conscripts and child soldiers) are responsible for any and all violence I may face in my working life.

Not literally, I mean, but figuratively. In my career, I’ve been tortured, beaten up and shot, and admittedly it’s been exclusively by assigned-male-at-births. But I suspect the reason AMABs attack me so often is they’ve been listening to feminists too much, in fact I’m sure of it.
Recently, I was stabbed in the thigh by the leader of a Russian neo-Nazi prison gang. I was going to assassinate him, and he took offence and tried to stop me. Where did a cis male neo-Nazi gangster get the idea to commit violence if not from reading Sheila Jeffries?

oh yeah, also down with the far-right themselves, they’re not very nice either, I suppose. They’re very stylish though, I like their scratchy tattoos and unusual haircuts (like my cool patchy style! I can’t get any tattoos though, I’m not supposed to have any identifying marks, being as I am identity-fluid). But yeah, they are very evil, almost as evil as feminists!

i realize you’re trying to troll me but you bring up a good point with your comment “feminists who oppose my right to identify as i please …. are responsible for any …. violence”

but i mean, are the feminists you’re describing TRUE feminists if they are attacking you and your identity? things to think about.

feminists aren’t evil, many are fighting for equality in the world (myself included). I think the word you’re thinking here is “misandrists”, which are women who want to put down men.

I would define TERFs as transphobic misandrists, imo. Thanks for your input, asshole

I’m not trying to troll, I agree? o___O? That is a good point though, feminists who exclude identity-fluid violence workers such as myself are not real feminists, they ARE misandrists, systemic haters of men and they are entirely responsible for other men assaulting me. I mean, if feminism doesn’t include males, who is it even for? These so-called “feminists” keep talking about “male violence” as if there’s any kind of pattern to violent crimes, and they use that as an excuse to keep males like me out of their spaces. Which is really mean and exclusionary to me, those misandrist bitch cunt scum!

a-door-behind-a-door:

down with terfs/rad fems but also down with alt-right; you both are very evil

YASSSS. Down with SKERFs and every kind of exclusionary radical feminists! I’ve been saying this for a long time: feminists who oppose my right to identify as I please and who oppose MY CHOICE to enter a career in the violence industry (along with the CHOICE of all conscripts and child soldiers) are responsible for any and all violence I may face in my working life.

Not literally, I mean, but figuratively. In my career, I’ve been tortured, beaten up and shot, and admittedly it’s been exclusively by assigned-male-at-births. But I suspect the reason AMABs attack me so often is they’ve been listening to feminists too much, in fact I’m sure of it.
Recently, I was stabbed in the thigh by the leader of a Russian neo-Nazi prison gang. I was going to assassinate him, and he took offence and tried to stop me. Where did a cis male neo-Nazi gangster get the idea to commit violence if not from reading Sheila Jeffries?

oh yeah, also down with the far-right themselves, they’re not very nice either, I suppose. They’re very stylish though, I like their scratchy tattoos and unusual haircuts (like my cool patchy style! I can’t get any tattoos though, I’m not supposed to have any identifying marks, being as I am identity-fluid). But yeah, they are very evil, almost as evil as feminists!

Dmitry Svodnik is still a cockwomble

Dmitry: hows it going shitman
Me: Yes, very clever, Dmitry. I’ll have you know I’m enjoying a very relaxing week, thank-you. Guro’s visiting, so I’ve only done two kills this week.
Dmitry: こんばんは加害者-さん
Me: Shut up, you can’t even speak English, you uncultured swine. Anyway, if you suddenly know so much about language, maybe you can tell me why some SKERF on the Internet called me a “tim” today. I saw some fake feminist article about “male violence” or something. If feminism excludes violent males, who’s it even for, I ask you? So I commented saying that, as a violent male of fluid identity, I felt it was cruel to exclude me from feminism just for my male-ness and my violence, and the author replied with some whiny bitchy pre-menstrual nagging rubbish that I admit I didn’t really read, in which she used the term “tim” to describe me (I read the bit about me, natch). What’s that about and should I be offended?
Dmitry: is probably cuz u look like Tim Roth
Me: Fuck off, no I don’t.
Dmitry: u do, in Reservoir Dogs were he is getting shot and crying “aaaaaa” all the time with his floppy hair, is u
Dmitry: big dave call u mister orange loooool
Me: FYI, all the AFABs dig my hair, the missing patches are bang on trend. So your little “polonium poisoning” prank has only made me even cooler and edgier.
Dmitry: anyway i think it mean “trans-identified male” wich u r cuz of ur identity fluid
Me: Oh, right. Fair enough, then.
Me: Really I’d rather they didn’t identify me at all, especially not to the police, but at least they respect my identity.
Me: Well, thank-you Dmitry, now kindly fuck off, I have better things to do than talk to you.
Dmitry: have nice evening gaspar! xD

radladiesunite:

radwitchescauldron:

theeleanorvance:

dorkinlesbian:

radladiesunite:

what a moron

Uuuughh

“the fear [of being abused] is not based on a real threat” for women who have already been abused

do… do u hear yourself

They don’t care. Abuse that happens to women isn’t real to them. And when something happens that they can’t just hand wave away, then we had it coming for a host of reasons- we spoke up, we were dressed wrong, we denied a man something he wanted.

These assholes use the same language as other abusive men. Gee, I wonder why…

Btw, this person isn’t just spouting off this nonsense online, they are implementing unisex communal stalls at their university.

They admitted there is not enough studies or evidence, which somehow proves their point (something they should know isn’t true if they supposedly study science):

But somehow also claim they KNOW that theres no risk:

Then they said the old “It’s never happened!!!!”:

When I provided instances of it happening, they go where every other liberal nutjob goes when face with this; They dismiss it, blame the victim, say prevention laws don’t work/don’t matter:

These people, even when faced with evidence, or lack thereof, even when provided counter examples and shown holes in their logic…still continue to prioritize TW comfort and safety over females. They claim it never happens, or when it does its inevitable, or that out fears are not based in reality, that women are not at risk. Sound familiar?

Well, actually, for your information, sweety, I can’t just walk into a bathroom and assault someone. It’s very difficult to get close to my targets in the first place, and it’s even more difficult if they have a nasty, exclusionary, SKERFy “safe space” specifically designed to keep you out!

Why shouldn’t I be allowed to assault people in bathrooms? It’s not like I go around assaulting people indiscriminately – my clients have to put a hit on them first – and it’s a useful place to clean up any blood afterwards.

Do you know how offensive it is to be told a whole institution exists only to exclude “male violence”, just because I’m a violent male? I think it’s really judgemental how these so-called “feminists” ally with religious organisations to have “moral objections” to assault and murder. I fully support neutral bathrooms for everyone! I’m sick of being challenged. If assigned-female-at-births would just shut the fuck up and stop screaming, and stop saying they “feel uncomfortable and threatened” when they see a large man in a balaclava throttling someone to death, then it would make my life MUCH easier. I’m just there to do my job, let me get on with it!

I mean, sure, sometimes assigned-male-at-births challenge me too (they don’t tend to scream, they just try to beat me up), and of course there are probably like one or two assigned-male-at-births who aren’t quite as discreet as I am and might want to assault people without a contract. But the REAL problem here is those exclusionary, gatekeeping, whiny, pre-menstrual, bitchy SKERF cunts. We need to focus on the real problem.

xojanedotcom:

7 Beauty Products that Make Me Feel Like a Better Feminist

I’m obsessed with makeup, but also obsessed with Faludi’s new wave feminist critique of academic deconstruction.

“Last year, it seemed like feminism finally became “cool.” Obviously, I’ve always thought feminism was the tits (see: my extremely passionate second-grade campaign for Sacagawea on the dollar coin); however, in 2015, it seemed like the rest of the world finally caught on.”

READ MORE

As you know, I am a proud feminist, and SKERFs keep criticising me for that. They say “you are a rich upper-class white het man who promotes sexual violence and cannot claim to speak for the millions of victims of the sex industry”, and it hurts my feelings.

So I was happy to learn I can just buy more feminism, thanks to XOJane! I might skip the lipstick – I don’t want to smear it when pulling my masks over my head – but the moisturiser looks pretty good. I work irregular hours and I don’t get a lot of sleep, so I’ve been meaning to get some skincare products to deal with my under-eye bags.
Plus I’m a bit sensitive about my nose. When I was new to the industry I was meant to kill an arms dealer, and he was a very large chap, and I didn’t realise I had to use more drugs on him. Schoolboy error! ^_^; Anyway, he alerted his goons and they broke both my legs and my nose, and it hasn’t looked quite the same since. The contouring stick should help with that, and make me a better feminist.

yes I’m still going on about dating preferences because it’s the main way I’m oppressed and I’m cross about it okay

You know, if SKERFs would give me a chance and date me, I think they’d find my fluid identity is a plus. I’m a sexy man of mystery! ^_-
Besides, they’re always saying they love a man in uniform, and I’m always beating random uniformed staff into unconsciousness, borrowing their clothes and documents and identifying as them.

And if you say “that doesn’t count, no matter what clothes you wear and what name you use, I don’t see you as John Smith, security guard, I still see you as Gaspar Milligan, stranglewank hitman, and I don’t want to date a murderer”, then YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.

That is invalidating my identity. It is essentialist, it is problematic and it is exclusionary. And it’s insulting my disguise skills – I had everyone else in the building convinced long enough for me to murder their boss and escape, so why can’t YOU see me as my preferred identity? PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE THE REASON HITMEN END UP AT THE BOTTOM OF THE THAMES, FEET ENCASED IN CONCRETE. It’s all your fault and you should feel bad.
Feminism will include men, regardless of murder history, or it will be bullshit.

Anyway if any REAL feminists (ie not SKERFy bitch cunt whore (I’m allowed to say that word because I’m a sex worker) scum) out there want to date me, just use the Ask box or leave a coded message in the Evening Standard letters page
😘

Clarification: WHY your dating preferences are discriminatory

Okay so I got a lot of complaints from SKERFs about my post “your dating preferences are discriminatory”. Well, really just one complaint – “if women don’t want to date a serial killer that’s their choice and you should respect that, blah blah blah mner ner ner (bitchy whiny PMS-ing SKERF voice)” – and I’d like to address it.
The point is, it’s erasing and invalidating my identity. I don’t identify as a hitman, when I’m on a job I identify myself as a security guard, a janitor, an admin assistant or whatever else I’m disguised as at the time. You don’t TELL the target you’re there to murder them, this is really basic (and I shouldn’t have to educate you about it!).
When fake feminists say they don’t want to date a serial killer, they’re saying they see me as a serial killer and not as whatever I say I am. And that’s terrible and they should feel bad!