Free Speech

Today I am very annoyed and upset about my free speech being restricted. When I’ve whacked a target, I like to take a few snaps to send to the client as proof of the kill. I also keep copies in my scrapbook and on my external hard drive, of course. ^_^ And sometimes, to attract new clients, I like to share the pictures around, just put them out there.

But some mean, whiny, frigid SKERFs say that it’s not nice to take pictures of extreme violence and enjoy them and share them around. 😦 So I thought I’d take some time to counter their silly, hysterical arguments! ^_^

1. “What about the victims?”

Okay, first of all, please don’t call my targets “victims”, because that diminishes their agency and invalidates them. If you’re suggesting that I forced brutal violence on anyone, that’s very offensive to the people I strangled and/or garroted to death. Really, out of me and you, which one is really disrespecting these folx?

2. “Why do you enjoy looking at and sharing recordings of extreme violence?”

It’s perfectly natural to enjoy looking at healthy human interactions like murders, and it’s natural to fantasise about exciting action. And that’s all it is: a fantasy! ^_^

Well, I mean, it’s not literally a fantasy, the targets are definitely dead (don’t worry, clients, I did do the job!) But it’s figuratively a fantasy. My clients look at the pictures and enjoy imagining how it happened, and the police look at the pictures and try to imagine what I might look like under my balaclava. Surely you don’t have a problem with fantasy, do you? That’s thought-crime.

3. “Did the victims really want you to kill them and distribute photos of their murder?”

Y’ALL. they are called TARGETS. -_- Also, I got paid, so there’s no problem. When money’s involved, it’s all okay. You don’t have to worry about it, it’s just business. It’s a job like any other: Wet Work Is Work. Any problems with the industry are caused by the stigma against our profession.

Anyway, now that that’s all out of the way, have some nice titillating pictures of my latest work! xoxo

Enjoy! And remember, if you don’t like them, it is your responsibility to examine your prejudices and repressed feelings until you do like them!

tooiconic:

evil-terf-hands:

The fact that 15 or so years ago, if I wanted to find BDSM type porn where women are getting beat, slapped, choked, etc, I actually had to put forth a modicum of effort to find it.. not a lot, but at least a modicum, whereas now you can’t escape it, & you accidentally stumble upon it ALL the time, is highly upsetting.

The fact that MOST straight males on tumblr seem to reblog a lot of abuse type porn, and it’s increasingly the “norm” on popular mainstream porn sites is highly upsetting.

If you’re a woman attracted to men, it seems like meeting a man who doesn’t have a desire to cause you some sort of pain or degradation during sex is almost nonexistent.

There’s something seriously wrong with men.

Yes let’s stereotype all men as only liking one type of sex. That’s not….. weird and disingenuous at all.

As a woman who is attracted to men, I can tell you that men completely vary in terms of their sexual interests. I’m more into it than most men I know (plenty of lesbians, bisexuals and gay men love BDSM too). Also what about the women who desire this? Would you like to tell me what’s wrong with us? Because there are LOTS of us. A lot of BDSM blogs are actually run by women (lol).

Also, to avoid these images on Tumblr is pretty easy. Only a few tags have these images. Safe search and blacklisting tags is a very easy fix too.

I *love* BDSM, and it’s nothing to do with any desire to cause pain or degradation to women during sex! (Tbqh, my thing is pyrophilia, when I’m with a woman I’m not particularly interested in interacting with her at all, I just light a candle and watch the flames the entire time and she just thinks I’m being romantic. but that’s another story.)

Anyway, when I first started out in the contract killing industry, it was difficult. Traditionally we strangle our targets and make it look like they’d died during a “solo gentlemanly misadventure”. Back in the ‘90s and early ‘00s, their surviving colleagues and families would say, “I won’t believe he was a stranglewanker, he must have been murdered!”, and we had to be very careful to cover our tracks and remove evidence. 😥

But now when we bump someone off, their families say “Well, he was an open-minded sort of guy, he probably was into dangerous choke porn”. Most of the time, they don’t even call the police! ^_^

The whole pro-kink umbrella of bondage, domestic abuse, sadism, murder, etc. has made my job so much easier. So thank-you for your support, and for centring us violent men in your activism. ❤ Have a 10% discount on me – just £9,000 in used notes or into my Swiss bank account instead of the usual ten grand. Just let me know the target and we’ll work something out! ^_^

A comic I drew for Jezebel, explaining why our industry is perfectly fine and not necessarily a
bad thing. And more importantly, why feminists should care about and
prioritise us and our employers (and not our targets) in their activism!
^_^

The Kink Umbrella

Lately I’ve been self-analysing and considering my identity with a critical lens, and I’m wondering if I could truly be classed as a “kinkster”. The kink umbrella is a broad movement, inclusive of just about everyone with an interest in bondage, domination, submission, sadism, abuse, wife beating or pain play.

But, and here’s the crucial thing: my interest in pain and bondage isn’t sexual. Sure, I enjoy my career, of course, but to me it’s just a job. And it really is a job just like any other: as we say in our industry, “Wet Work Is Work”! ^_^ (Really, my personal preference is pyrophilia, but that’s a story for another time.)

So, my question is, am I valid? Please tell me I’m valid. I mean, I identify as a valid kinkster and I am a queer-identified heterosexual, but is that enough??